"Doctrines that are embarrassing will not be mentioned in polite company." (Method in Theology 299.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(159)
-
▼
September
(40)
- Postmodern theology: bibliography
- Wilfred's Beyond Settled Foundations
- Lonergan on person
- Common names and properly explanatory terms
- Embarassing doctrines
- A "perhaps not numerous center"
- New relation between philosophy and theology
- Postmodern theology: bibliography
- Postmodern theology and the tradition-innovation d...
- Hauerwas inspiration for Radical Orthodoxy
- Secularism, the Scotist notion of being, and India
- Lonergan is not 'sexy'
- The varieties of postmodernism
- Radical Orthodoxy on faith and reason
- Metaphysics and the sciences
- Radical Orthodoxy and Lonergan
- Radical Orthodoxy and Balthasar
- Aidan Nichols and Radical Orthodoxy
- Objectivity, reality, the 'already-out-there-now-r...
- How Great Ye art
- Lonergan and Thomas Aquinas
- Economics slowly by slowly
- "Towards a New Economic Order": Day Three
- "Towards a New Economic Order": Day Two
- Of footballers and coaches
- "Towards a New Economic Order", Divyadaan, Nashik,...
- McShane and the Workshop "Towards a New Economic O...
- Schumpeter: from statics to dynamics in economics
- McShane interacting with the SYBPh class
- Making judgments: practical exercises
- Lonergan on Basic and Surplus Goods & Services
- Money is not the centre of an economy
- New book by McShane: physics, economics, history
- Milbank and Pickstock on Lonergan
- Wittgenstein - and Lonergan
- God?
- Kerr on Lonergan's Grace and Freedom
- A thousand gardens
- Introducing the Economics Workshop
- Kung Fu Panda and the notion of being
-
▼
September
(40)
About Me
- Ivo Coelho
- The glories of a blue sky, the beauty of terse prose, and the mysteries of Being and Believing...
No comments:
Post a Comment